Tag: SQL Server 2008
The right tool for the job
I read a blog post from Brent Ozar (blog|twitter) explaining recent encounters he had with a plumber and an exterminator. In this post he shows the great service provided by both professionals and that he was happy to pay each professional a prorated rate of about $1,000 dollars per hour. Wow! How do they make [...]
Posted: July 14th, 2011 under General.
Tags: SQL Doctor, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server Performance
Comments: none
THREADPOOL waits high after upgrade from SQL2000
You may be inadvertently limiting the number of worker threads available to the SQL Server process. This could be caused from the ‘max worker threads’ option being set to 255 after the upgrade of the SQL Server 2000 instance to a later version of SQL Server. On SQL Server 2000, the default setting for ‘max [...]
Posted: March 23rd, 2011 under SDR-W6, Wait Stats.
Tags: max worker threads, SQL Server, SQL Server 2000, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server Performance, THREADPOOL, Wait Stats
Comments: none
Using the wait resource for PAGE% wait types
Earlier this week I was researching a performance issue on a SQL Server instance using the ‘sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks’ and ‘sys.dm_exec_requests’ DMV’s and noticed a ton of page latch and page io latch waits. This is nothing unusual when dealing with performance issues and is normally just one of the signs of poorly written queries, missing indexes, [...]
Posted: February 11th, 2011 under Wait Stats.
Tags: Page Io Latch, Page Latch, Query Optimization, Query Performance, Query Tuning, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server Performance, Wait Stats
Comments: 2
Parallelism: Stop waiting!
In my previous blog post ‘Parallelism: Hurry up and wait’ I discussed how parallel queries cause CXPACKET waits. I also covered the common causes for these waits to be high on an OLTP server. Today I want to finish up my thoughts on the subject and hopefully round out the discussion for both OLTP and [...]
Posted: January 25th, 2011 under Wait Stats.
Tags: cost threshold for parallelism, CXPACKET, Parallelism, Query Optimization, Query Performance, Query Tuning, SQL Doctor, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server Performance, Wait Stats
Comments: none
Parallelism: Hurry up and wait
At the 2010 SQL PASS Summit we had the great pleasure of speaking with the well known SQL Server MVP Pinal Dave (blog). One of the topics that were discussed was the use of wait stats by SQL doctor for generating recommendations and he agreed to spend extra time with us to discuss his [...]
Posted: January 14th, 2011 under Wait Stats.
Tags: cost threshold for parallelism, CXPACKET, max degree of parallelism, Parallelism, Query Optimization, Query Performance, Query Tuning, SQL Doctor, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server Performance, Wait Stats
Comments: 2
Database compatibility level
The compatibility level of a database is set at database creation time based on the compatibility level of the ‘model’ database. This is no surprise to anyone and obvious to almost everyone familiar with the creation of a database and the purpose of the ‘model’ database. What is surprising (to me at least) is how [...]
Posted: November 23rd, 2010 under Database Configuration, Recommendations, SDR-DC4.
Tags: database compatibility level, Database Configuration, SDR-DC4, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008
Comments: 1
Lock Pages in Memory, Address Windowing Extensions (AWE), 32-bit/64-bit, Confused?
As you may be able to tell from the schizophrenic title of this blog post, there is plenty of confusion around ‘Lock Pages in Memory’ and ‘Address Windowing Extensions’ for SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008. There are plenty of reasons why this subject is confusing and among those are the following: Changes between [...]
Posted: October 13th, 2010 under Address Windowing Extensions (AWE), Lock Pages in Memory, Memory Optimization, SDR-M1, SDR-M2, SDR-M3, SDR-M4, SDR-M5.
Tags: 32-bit, 64-bit, Address Windowing Extensions, AWE, Lock Pages in Memory, Memory Optimization, SDR-M1, SDR-M2, SDR-M3, SDR-M4, SDR-M5, SQL Server 2005, SQL Server 2008, SQL Server Performance
Comments: 3
